Saving Mumbai's Heritage Botanical Garden
The Struggle of the Save Rani Bagh Botanical Garden Foundation
It is impossible to talk about Veermata Jijabai Bhosale Udyan, popularly known as Rani Bagh, without using
superlatives Mumbai's most visited and most affordable park, largest green open public space, only
heritage botanical garden, largest agglomeration of 3,213 trees, widest species diversity (843 plant species
belonging to 149 families) . . . the list is seemingly endless.
Above: Welcoming vistas - a rich and diverse botanical garden - definitive
archival documents stand testimony to its existence, value and growth
over the past 150 years
The immense value of a public botanical garden can be appreciated when we consider that Mumbai has the lowest
open space to population ratio in the world 0.03 acre (0.12 hectares) per 1,000 people against the
international norm of 4 acres (1.62 hectares) per 1,000. Rani Bagh functions as a vital green lung for the
city, attracting an average of 8,000 visitors in a day, climbing to 30,000 on holidays. It is blessed with
very fertile soil and trees here grow to girths and heights not usually seen in Mumbai. This habitat supports
a rich diversity of fauna.
Established by the Agri-Horticultural Society of Western India in 1861 as the Victoria Gardens, the botanical
garden was laid out on 33 acres (3,546 square metres) of land in Byculla. In 1890, 15 acres (6.7 hectares)
were added to establish a small zoo. At the same time, the world economic recession led to the bankruptcy
of the Agri-Horticultural Society which ceased to exist and the Bombay Municipality took over Victoria
Gardens. Ever since then the botanical garden and small zoo have co-existed. In the 1990s two additional
adjacent plots were acquired, bringing the total area to 53 acres (21.45 hectares).
In keeping with the European tradition of the day, the botanical garden was adorned with various monuments
- a clock tower, a museum, a bandstand, the triumphal triple arch or Italianate gateway, a conservatory and
several imposing statues - a classic blend of built and natural heritage. The stately museum, clock tower and
triumphal arch are made of Porbandar stone. The Italianate gateway with its Corinthian columns harmonizes with
the design of the museum, presenting an imposing gateway to the natural beauty within the park.
The gardens were laid out in the classical Renaissance axial planning design prevalent in many European cities.
The pathways are wide and radiate in all directions, allowing the huge numbers of visitors enough space to
wander about and enjoy the green space. All axes and pathways are flanked by charming internal gardens.
George Birdwood, the first Curator of the Victoria and Albert (now Bhau Daji Lad) Museum described Victoria
Gardens as a "garden of delight". Unlike many manicured parks Rani Bagh has a natural, welcoming, wooded
ambience. In recognition of the importance of the concept of green heritage, VJB Udyan has been accorded the
status of a Grade II-B heritage site (serial no. 530 Schedule of Heritage Regulations) and the Mumbai Heritage
Conservation Committee (MHCC) has listed 'botanical garden' as a special feature.
Ominous Clouds of "Makeover" Gather - The Save Rani Bagh Botanical Garden Committee is born
In February 2007 a most severe blow was dealt to the 138 years of coexistence of the botanical garden and zoo.
With much fanfare the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) announced its plans for a makeover without
parallel. An allegedly fuddy-duddy park was to be transformed into a Singapore-style "international" zoo at
the astounding cost of Rs 433 crore. The "international" partners of the project: Messrs. H.K.S. Designer and
Consultant International, for a hefty fee of Rs 4 crore, set about designing the new "international" zoo.
For a group of us friends and botany enthusiasts (Hutokshi Rustomfram, Shubhada Nikharge, Katie Bagli,
Hutoxi Arethna, Sheila Tanna and Renee Vyas) who frequented the gardens and parks in and around Mumbai, Rani Bagh
was a favoured haunt. We were shocked when we heard of the redevelopment proposal, knowing that Rani Bagh had no
vacant treeless space that could be earmarked for the proposed new zoo. In April 2007 we decided to band together
and investigate. We found that we had entered the arena of struggle at an opportune moment - the BMC proposal had
not yet received the mandatory approval of two statutory bodies: the Central Zoo Authority (CZA) and the Mumbai
Heritage Conservation Committee (MHCC). We attended Right to Information (RTI) workshops and set about gathering
the minutest data available - correspondence, plans, minutes of meetings etc. We resolved to neither seek nor
accept any funding and shared the expenses among ourselves. Soon we set up a website, floated an online petition
and began garnering the support of common citizens and environmental bodies. After five eventful years the Save
Rani Bagh Committee has been registered as a public charitable trust, the Save Rani Bagh Botanical
The heavy construction activity envisaged was sure to turn a natural green heritage site into a synthetic glass
and concrete zoo. The list of new features was mind-boggling: Australian, African, Southeast Asian and Indian
zones, an aquarium, night safari, restaurants, even an artificial Indian Ocean. Where indeed was the space
or the need for this elaborate amusement park? Even a glass-walled fine dining eatery was planned, from where
well-heeled patrons could view cheetahs as they wined and dined.
Above: A recipe for disaster. Images reproduced from a report announcing the makeover
Existing and proposed land use
(Maharashtra Times of March 6, 2008)
Note the dense greenery in the layout drawing titled "Existing land use". As much as 63 per cent of the land is
denoted in green as area under garden, while the area marked in blue denotes existing animal enclosures. In
contrast, note the shrunken green area in the drawing titled "Proposed land use" and the correspondingly increased
area under animal enclosures.
Above: Note the shrinkage in the garden space and the corresponding increase in the space for animal enclosures in the graphic.
Pathways - heritage layout disregarded
Drawings by Priti Kolambekar
We successfully argued before the MHCC that the existing layout of Rani Bagh following the Renaissance axial design,
being integral to its heritage status, needed to be preserved. The extensive crisscross of pathways is a decongestion device.
The proposed master plan, however, presented a single pathway. Had it been implemented, it would have definitely led to
congestion and overcrowding with the likely hazard of a stampede, given the density of visitors to the park.
Above: The single pathway in the proposed plan would have led to untold over-crowding, obliterated the
classical design and destroyed the flora. Drawings by Priti Kolambekar
Impact of Proposed Makeover
Two major issues faced Rani Bagh in the event of the new master plan ever coming to reality:
Enormous construction activity
The price tag itself sounded the direst warning. If Rs 433 crore of public money was to be spent then surely
the scale of construction would be enormous. The first layout drawings we received under the RTI Act confirmed
our worst fears. Every pathway, water body, animal enclosure was slated to be demolished and a host of new
ones constructed. New moats, electrification, water and sewage lines would have wreaked havoc on age-old tree
root systems. The BMC planners acted as if they were dealing with a clean slate rather than a 150-year-old
heritage botanical garden.
Egalitarian park turns elitist?
After spending Rs 433 crore of public funds, fixing the post-makeover entry fee was to be the BMC's prerogative.
What would the tab be? Rs 300? Rs 400? At Rs 5 for adults and Rs 2 for children the current entry fee is
affordable for practically any cross-section of citizenry, keeping the garden accessible to underprivileged
sections. The issue of steep entry fee rise together with that of preservation of the heritage botanical garden
became the two chief planks of our online petition. We expressed the view that common citizens, starved as they
are of green open spaces, have every right to continue to visit Rani Bagh as they have for the past 150 years.
Milestones in a Multi-Pronged Struggle
The Save Rani Bagh Committee harnessed all democratic institutions and processes accessible to common citizens.
We forwarded innumerable memoranda, appeared for official hearings and site visits, raised our voice through
the media and approached the Bombay High Court under writ jurisdiction.
Harnessing the power of the Right to Information,
The RTI Act became an invaluable tool. Often we procured the same documents from different bodies for instance,
the CZA and the BMC and cross-checked data. We exposed the inconsistencies between stated positions and recorded
minutes. Interestingly, the BMC later stopped recording minutes of Rani Bagh meetings! Personal follow-up, systematic
scrutiny of documentation and detailed presentations have been our strengths. We built up a bank of correspondence
with the BMC, CZA, MHCC and the Central Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) and exhorted all four bodies to
reject the proposal. As the Save Rani Bagh Committee we took a firm policy decision - one that we have observed to
this day. We would approach every public servant but would keep away from power-brokers and politicians of all hues.
Awareness campaigns and solidarity
We raised awareness through nature trails and audio-visual programmes at schools and colleges. The media gave
consistent coverage to the issue. Virtually all Mumbai environmental groups lent support - BNHS, WWF-India,
Sanctuary Asia, Friends of the Trees, CitiSpace, Awaz Foundation and Bombay Environemtal Action Group In addition
the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Urban Design Research Institute, Oval Trust, AGNI and Clean Air too endorsed our
position. (See Appendix B.) We are deeply grateful to all the bodies listed above. All groups stressed along with
us that a heritage botanical garden was location-specific and a large zoo, if needed for the city, could be set up
at an alternate location.
Above: Students of the Sir J.J. College of Architecture take a pledge to preserve the
botanical garden in October 2007
after an awareness raising walk conducted by the
Save Rani Bagh Committee.
As early as September 2007 we met with the CZA Patnaik-Mehta expert team. Even though their report supported our stand,
the CZA accorded conditional approval to the plan stating that not a single tree, bush or creeper was to be cut,
transplanted or removed. This farcical condition, is of course impossible to translate into practice. We, however,
remained undaunted, converted adversity to advantage and repeatedly quoted the CZA mantra to the BMC not a single
tree-bush-creeper could be touched. The CZA officials had informally told us the ball was now in our court; however,
we continued to apply to them, visiting New Delhi three times and sending a stream of petitions citing numerous reasons
for a review. This persistence bore fruit two years later when the CZA under a new Member Secretary did undertake a review
and dispatched an investigating team Dr Eruch Bharucha and Mr V.B. Sawarkar. Once again, we met both experts and explained
Knocking on the doors of the Bombay High Court
Since the early days of our struggle we were cognizant of the fact that we may eventually have to file a public interest
litigation (PIL). To this end we consciously created a water-tight record forwarding detailed representations to all
official bodies. Several lawyers and a few environmental activists advised us to only fight for the survival of the trees
and not for the entire botanical garden, its heritage layout and public access to trees. We, however, fought on all three
issues. We argued that preserving the geographical area of the botanical garden, its layout and accessibility to trees would
actually save them in practice. A halfway compromise would have spelt doom. When the BMC announced that it was going ahead
with the plan even though we knew it did not then have the requisite approvals, we filed a PIL to make the plan public.
This and a subsequent contempt petition perhaps acted as a warning to the CZA, MHCC and BMC in later years. If we could
approach the High Court to make the plan public surely we would do the same to prevent the decimation of the botanical garden.
Over the past five years of our struggle we have interacted with three Municipal Commissioners, two Additional Municipal
Commissioners, three Superintendents of Gardens and innumerable BMC officials and the Union Minister of Environment and Forests.
Rani Bagh became our second home and the BMC HQ became our third. We protested every unlawful act and impropriety - unauthorized
construction works, BMC corporators on overseas jaunts at the BMC Consultant HKS Designers' expense, an interested MHCC member's
wrongful presence at meetings and so on.
The struggle to convince the Mumbai Heritage Conservation Committee to reject the plan was long and hard but also had its
occasional moments of humour. We played our trump card in 2007 by successfully petitioning the MHCC to include the term
botanical garden as a special feature. Our hands were greatly strengthened by the unstinted and rock solid support of
Mr D.M. Sukthankar, former Chief Secretary and Chairman of the MHCC, and Mr S. Kale, former Municipal Commissioner and
Chairman of the Pune Heritage Committee. They participated at MHCC hearings and meetings with the Municipal Commissioner.
We presented minutely analysed data and countered every false claim with hard evidence demonstrating how the BMC manipulated
figures to suit its ends.
BMC denies existence of botanical garden
Above: Former Municipal Commissioners and concerned citizens - Mr. D.M. Sukthankar and Mr. S.G. Kale threw their weight behind
the cause of protecting the botanical garden and demanded that the redevelopment plan be scrapped. They represented with the
Save Rani Bagh Committee at hearings before the MHCC and the BMC
At one juncture the then Additional Municipal Commissioner (AMC) Mr R.A. Rajeev denied the very existence of the botanical garden!
Thus began a new phase in our struggle. We appealed to all environmental groups for their support to counter this ludicrous stance
and furnished every available proof of the existence of the botanical garden we laboured through volumes of gazetteers,
histories of Mumbai, met heritage experts and historians, combed national and international websites. The AMC Mr Rajeev was not
fazed when shown that BMC's own website listed Rani Bagh as a botanical garden; and not even by the fact that he had himself
accepted an Indian Heritage Society award for a beautifully maintained heritage botanical garden in December 2008 from the
Maharashtra Governor at Raj Bhavan.
Impasse at MHCC and the appointment of experts
Above: MHCC appointed experts, Dr. Asad Rahmani and Dr. Marselin Almeida rooted for the botanical garden, unequivocally
denouncing the redevelopment proposal.
As the BMC refused to acknowledge the existence of the botanical garden, the members of the Save Rani Bagh Committee exhorted
the MHCC to fulfil its mandate and protect the garden. To navigate through this impasse the MHCC appointed Dr Marselin Almeida
and Dr Asad Rahmani as experts. Both had long been well-wishers of our cause and had denounced the international zoo proposal.
Their firm stand helped close the argument regarding the existence of the botanical garden. After 15 months of deliberations,
the MHCC returned the proposal in May 2010. One of the objections raised by the MHCC was that the Rani Bagh tree survey was
riddled with errors. The BMC then assigned the task of conducting a fresh floral survey to Dr Almeida. The detailed survey,
completed in October 2010 does the botanical garden proud 843 plant species in a 53 acre campus is clearly an outstanding
Unauthorized construction and dumping of debris
We protested against the unauthorized construction of a temporary animal hospital where hundreds of bushes and climbers were
cleared thereby violating CZA's cardinal condition. This later helped us secure a CZA review. In another instance, debris was
dumped in an internal garden for 11 months. When after several complaints it was cleared, four trees lay dead. We sent pictures
to the BMC, CZA, MHCC and the MoEF, underlining the point that if in the process of debris dumping and removal four trees were
destroyed, many hundreds might be sacrificed if the grandiose makeover got underway.
Above left: Repeated representations regarding the unauthorised construction of a so-called temporary animal hospital finally
led to a CZA review and eventual rejection of the plan. Above right: Four healthy trees sacrificed due to inexplicable dumping
of debris - a grim forecast of Rani Bagh's fate had the makeover gone through.
Backing from the Ministry of Environment and Forests
Two decisive nails in the coffin of the international zoo were delivered courtesy the Minister of Environment and Forests
Mr Jairam Ramesh and the Municipal Commissioner Mr Subodh Kumar. In March 2011 we met Mr Jairam Ramesh who wrote to the
Maharashtra Chief Minister unequivocally backing our stand. The Minister's office released his comprehensive letter to the
press where it was widely reported. (See Appendix B.) Soon after at a Mumbai press conference Mr Ramesh declared that the
sanctity of the botanical garden ought to be maintained. Mr Subodh Kumar's announcement of a budget slash from Rs 433 crore
to Rs 150 crore also pushed the international zoo concept closer to the waste bin.
MHCC and CZA Reject International Zoo Proposal
In January 2011 following Dr Almeida's floral survey the BMC once again presented before the MHCC the old master plan with
superficial tweaking. At a third formal hearing we exposed the usual contradictions and pitfalls in BMC documents and also
demonstrated that 866 trees had seemingly vanished - they were not even plotted on the layout drawing. The CZA under a new
member secretary, Mr B.S. Bonal, had written to the BMC stating that a large zoo as planned be located outside the city on
a 50 hectare plot and asked for a revised plan. We obtained a copy of the CZA letter under RTI and presented it before the
MHCC which accepted our contention that that the BMC had failed to disclose the CZA's latest prescriptions. With the final
directions from the MHCC to retain all pathways and existing animal enclosures and not build any new ones, the original
plan for an international zoo was virtually cast aside. In May 2011 the CZA finally prescribed a strict limit on the number
of Indian and exotic animal species and directed that the botanical garden area and its identity be preserved.
Current Status and the Need for Vigilance
Above: A sampling of press coverage of the plan's eventual rejection
Once the concept of a large "international" zoo was finally laid to rest, it became necessary that a far more conservative
plan, restricted to renovation of the existing small zoo, be prepared which would naturally once again need to pass muster
with the CZA and MHCC. The CZA took matters in hand and held a meeting with BMC officials to discuss the details of the new
plan faithfully adhering to MHCC and CZA diktats. Thereafter, a fresh layout plan dated September 29, 2011 was submitted to
the CZA for approval. We examined this plan (after obtaining a copy under the RTI Act) and noted with some satisfaction that
most of the botanical garden area was not encroached upon by new animal enclosures and that all pathways had been retained.
However, we were concerned on two main counts: (i) that certain pathways designated as service roads could render certain
large internal garden areas out of bounds for the public, and (ii) that a few proposed animal enclosures were to be needlessly
shifted and would encroach upon the space and greenery of the botanical garden. We submitted our objections to the CZA and BMC
in November 2011 and after several reminders received mere verbal assurances presumably meant to assuage our fears. At a formal
meeting with the Municipal Commissioner, Shri Subodh Kumar in March 2012 which Mr Sukthankar also attended, the very same oral
pronouncements were reiterated by the Additional Municipal Commissioner.
A decisive meeting with the present Municipal Commissioner, Shri Sitaram Kunte in June 2013 at which Mr. Sukthankar and Mr. Kale
were also present appeared to turn the tide with Mr. Kunte openly questioning the grave deficiencies in the plan. Eventually
after two years of verbal palliatives we received a written undertaking from the Zoo Director that the so-called proposed service
roads would be accessible to visitors. This small victory should go a long way in keeping large sections of the botanical garden
accessible to visitors. However, the serious issue of proposed animal enclosures encroaching upon the botanical garden space
remained unresolved. We, together with Mr Sukthankar and Mr Kale were present for another official hearing before the MHCC on
March 18, 2014 where we demonstrated with the aid of drawings and other documents that the MHCC guidelines of March 2011 had
been violated in that the area occupied by proposed animal enclosures had exceeded the area occupied by existing animal enclosures
by as much 16,000 square metres. We demanded that a substantially enlarged proposed plan be made available in sections to enable
careful scrutiny and that each and every tree be positioned accurately on the plan. The MHCC has taken due note of our objections
and we await the Chairman's fresh directions to the BMC. We foresee yet another long haul of representations and hearings before
the CZA and MHCC to ensure that the new proposal obeys their stipulated terms in letter and spirit.
Another contentious issue has been the unauthorised erection of permanent cement and brick walls at different locations within
the campus which have been erected without seeking MHCC approval. We repeatedly protested against these unseemly and unauthorised
walls as soon as they sprung up in 2012, on the grounds that they restrict visitor access, fragment the botanical space and
convey the erroneous impression that areas lying beyond the walls do not belong to the botanical garden. As always, the MHCC
responded to our complaints and conducted a site visit where we were invited to be present. In June 2013 we were heartened to
know that the MHCC Chairman Shri V. Ranagnathan had issued an unequivocal order to demolish the walls. We have repeatedly exhorted
that the walls be torn down but to no avail. At a recent hearing in March 2014 before the MHCC the issue of the unauthorised walls
was vociferously debated and the Chairman has asked the BMC to explain why the MHCC orders have been ignored. Presently, this long
drawn out highly contentious issue remains unresolved.
Even though we have largely succeeded in our endeavours so far, we are acutely conscious of the need to be vigilant No future
planner should ever have the scope to proclaim that Rani Bagh is "only" a garden and not a heritage botanical garden. To
consolidate the hard-won struggle we had asked for a series of events to mark 150 years of the botanical garden nature trails,
booklets, field guides, brochures, symposia, workshops and plaques in the park. A successful meeting with the Municipal
Commissioner made us hopeful that our suggestions would bear fruit but unfortunately, notwithstanding numerous meetings and
brainstorming sessions, bureaucratic fumbling has landed the plans in cold storage.
We started out just over five years ago, with no influential social contacts or money power. Today we look back and marvel at
the number of genuinely concerned professionals and individuals who came forward to support us. This has been a great learning
curve and a heartening experience for us all. The struggle to protect Mumbai's largest green open public space has been a journey
punctuated by moments of anguish and moments of joy all in all an exciting and rewarding ride.